However, the sentence shall be executed for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A was on September 2016, 2016, on the basis of an annual relation of a policeman.

At the hand phone of C (34 years old), the Defendants conspired to take photographs of the above E dialogue screen using their own portable phone and sent it to Defendant B who was aware of it. The Defendants prepared crimes, such as gathering money by threatening D and confirming D’s house and family members by threatening D to the effect that the Defendants were in custody of the above E dialogue screen.

1. The Defendants’ co-crimes of the Defendants with a cell phone number of the victim D ( South, 53 years old) confirmed by C’s portable phone number around August 1, 2017, with “Isn Don Don Don Don Don Don Don Don Don Don Don Don Don Don Don

D It also needs to be seen as a fluent and fluoring fluor.

The problem to be solved is not what is.

D T. T. T. C. Liquor Tax

H. N. N. L. L. L. A. N. L. L.A.

It is essential to find out the arbitrgic test of the arguk FC D's arsengic test.

On August 5, 2017, a written message was sent to the victim, and the victim’s photograph taken with C along with C was sent to the victim’s text message.

Then, on September 20, 2017, the Defendants found the house of the victim in the Seo-gu, U.S. on September 20, 2017, and opened the victim by telephone, and Defendant A said that “I would bom off the victim and his branch with “I would c’s male-child path, and E dialogue exchanged with D”, and Defendant B b frighted the victim and fright up the victim.

계속하여 피고인들은 다음 날인 2017. 9. 21. 19:00 경 서울 송파구 H에 있는 상호 불상의 커피숍에서, 피해자의 대리인 역할을 맡은 G를 만 나, 피고인 B은 자신의 휴대 전화기에 보관하고 있던 위 E 대화 사진 1 장을 G에게 보여주고, 피고인 A은 “D 이 어디 갔는지 다 알고, 그 여자랑 뭘 했는지도 다 안다....