However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

At around 03:30 on March 19, 2014, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol in front of the Dongwon KTT, a 49-gil-ro 51-gilon-ro, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of public duties on the duty of handling the report 112 reports by the police officer, who belongs to the Suwon-nam Police Station C Zone C District of the Suwon Police Station, sent out one time on the left side of the slopeD sent out after receiving a report of 112 that “any person is using on the road.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of statutes on damaged parts and on-site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The execution of a sentence shall be suspended in consideration of the fact that it is not good in that it assaults a police officer in uniform for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, but there is no record of exceeding the fine, and that it is divided and reflected in depth;