However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 17:40 on August 10, 2015, the Defendant, at the front parking lot C located in the Won-si, had the business owner dismissed the Defendant from the representative director, and had the Defendant drive the Defendant’s EKaren car, which is a dangerous object, and parked at the above D’s wife F (W, 63) the Defendant damaged the Defendant’s repair cost of KRW 451,779 on the right-hand part of the said Karen car, which is owned by the victim F (W, the wife of the said D).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 369 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting a crime and Articles 369 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act: Selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection, etc. of Social Service Orders;