When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a guest who gets on a taxi operated by the victim.

1. Around 23:45 on January 30, 2020, the Defendant interfered with the business of the Defendant: (a) was driving a D taxi operated by the Victim C (year 52) in Ansan-si Member B; (b) went into the front distance in front of the F in the Yan-gu E; and (c) subsequently, the Defendant was unable to sleep the victim after calculating the taxi fee; and (d) caused the victim’s influence, on the ground that the victim was influence, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s business by force.

2. At around 00:10 on January 31, 2020, the Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender under suspicion of interference with the same duties as the above Paragraph (2); (b) was transferred to the 324 scam box under the same title as the 324 scambling box; and (c) was under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant, while drinking, committed an act of disturbance in the public office by uttering very rough words and actions, such as “I scam within a scam, scam, scam, scam, scam, and scam, scam in the scam.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. On-site photographs, screen pictures and photographs related to the case;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (the main cancellation of a government office's film investigation concerned);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of cancellation by government offices): Selection of each fine;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;