고용보험료 및 산업재해보상보험료 등 징수처분 취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On May 15, 2014, the Defendant selected the Plaintiff, who is a business operator engaged in construction business, as a business place subject to the final settlement of employment insurance premium and industrial accident compensation insurance premium (hereinafter “employment and industrial accident compensation insurance premium”) from 2011 to 2013, and proceeded with the final settlement procedure.
B. On September 3, 2014, the Defendant received various data for the settlement of final accounts from the Plaintiff, calculated the total annual remuneration in question as shown in Table 1, calculated the employment and industrial premium by multiplying the total annual remuneration by the premium rate, respectively, and issued a disposition to collect employment and industrial premium for the pertinent year from 2011 to 2013, as shown in Table 2, to the Plaintiff.
(hereinafter "Disposition of this case") . [Attachment 1] 2012 2013 industrial accident insurance (won), 628, 327, 210, 375, 581, 1520, 362, 362, 740, 3678, 468, 2052, 2048, 367, 2058, 3696, 2052, 367, 2058, 3696, 205, 207, 3648, 2696, 205, 207, 3696, 205, 205, 3696, 205, 367, 3605, 206, 3605, 286, 257, 207, 37827, 2658
C. The Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal against the instant disposition, but was dismissed on May 12, 2015.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, Eul evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The plaintiff's assertion includes the cost of outsourcing and personnel expenses invested in the subcontracted construction work.