When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On December 16, 2015, the Defendant reported to the effect that, around December 16, 2015, around 21:33, 2015, the Defendant sent a report to the effect that, in front of the Busan University Stambling Camps Security Office located in 1268-50, the Defendant sent his phone to the head by reducing the phone call to 112.

On December 16, 2015, the Defendant demanded the police officers B, etc. who were called upon receiving the aforementioned report and sent to the hospital, etc., and requested the police officers B, etc. to stop their blood transfusion while entering the hospital, and arrived at the locking Police Station D box located in C at the Singyang C at the Singyang time. While under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was unable to have the police officers, etc., who were on duty under the influence of alcohol and avoided the disturbance for about 20 minutes, such as “b, etc. of rings, shots, shots, shots, and shots.”

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, forced or scamed by very rough words and conducts at government offices.

2. On December 16, 2015, the Defendant: (a) found the Defendant under the influence of alcohol at the 1545 smuggling Police Station as of December 16, 2015, around 22:20, the Defendant:20, at around 22:20, the Defendant: (b) found the Defendant at around 1545, and (c) stated that “D police officers have given notice of inspection because they did not go to the hospital.” However, the Defendant heard the horses from the police officer on duty that “at present there is no staff in the night hearing room” that “I want to have the Democratic Police assigned by this weather police with 24 hours of service, know-how, she would have died.”

When putting a bath with opening, she was unable to bring a disturbance for about 45 minutes, such as putting the entrance door off.

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, forced or scamed by very rough words and conducts at government offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes to the statements B, E, and F;

1. Relevant provisions of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the facts constituting the crime, and the choice of each sentence, Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and the choice of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, Article 38 Section 1 of the Criminal Code, which increases concurrent crimes.