However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On May 5, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 22:00 on the street in front of the Busan East-gu, Busan-dong; (b) was urged to return home from D in the situation where the Busan-dong Police Station C District was affiliated with the Busan-dong Police Station C District; and (c) subsequently, the Defendant fladdddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by police officials.

2. In the date and place indicated in paragraph (1), the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by 10 minutes of a 10-minute, such as “I am sweet, sweet, and sweet, and I am sweet, I am sweet, I am sweet, I am sweet, and I am sweet, and I am am sweet.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds of suspended execution shall be determined in the same manner as the disposition, comprehensively taking into account the following circumstances, such as the shape of each of the crimes in this case, the criminal records of the defendant, the criminal records of the defendant, the fact that the defendant is against himself, and the age, character and conduct