2. In light of the following: although the degree of damage caused by the instant crime is not significant, the Defendant’s previous conviction was committed several times, the victim was not recovered, and the Defendant’s appearance of the crime is not good, such as taking a bath against the police officer at the police station after the Defendant was arrested as an offender in the crime of this case; and considering all other matters regarding the sentencing as indicated in the records and arguments of this case, such as the background of the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, circumstances after the instant crime, the risk of recidivism, etc., the Defendant’s argument is deemed appropriate, and thus, the Defendant’s argument is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.