When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On May 20, 2014, at around 17:15, the Defendant, at the office of the Bacheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Ma-dong, he was to take a look at the issue of large-scale width with the victim E (the age of 61) and to listen to the phrase “a person who is even deducted from the victim, and Ma-gu, Ma-gu, Ma-gu,” and then the victim was to walk the side of the victim once due to the Ma-dong accident, and suffered from the victim’s face with his hair, and suffered from the victim’s an injury, such as cutting the body of the days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The statements of witnesses E and F in the third protocol of the trial;

1. The recording of statements by witnesses G in the fourth trial record;

1. Each police statement of the E, F, and G;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of a victim's name, face, bridge, arms, etc.;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for sentencing of the provisional payment order does not change the degree of injury suffered by the victim due to the instant crime, but the defendant's act itself recognizes the fact that the victim suffered from the injury of the pelke, the dispute over the pelke is likely to lead to the instant crime by contingently taking into account the following two factors: (a) the defendant appears to have caused the instant crime by an agreement between the victim and the victim; (b) the defendant does not want the punishment of the defendant; and (c) the defendant does not have any criminal records of the same kind and suspension of qualification or more.