2. In full view of the following circumstances revealed by the record of the judgment, the possibility of the victim’s injury may not be ruled out, i.e., the victim’s injury, or the victim’s injury caused by an attack against the defendant. The evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone, as stated in the facts charged, assault the victim’s chest and shoulder by means of smuggling, and thereby, was proved without reasonable doubt that the victim suffered an injury, such as the number of days of treatment, for the treatment of the victim.

It is insufficient to view it, and there is no other evidence to prove it.

(1) The victim was investigated by the police, and stated that “the defendant was blickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly flickly f

“The question was asked to the effect that “I am in a state of secret,” and that I am asked to the effect that I am in a state of secret, and that I am in a way that the Defendant was not strong.”

② In addition, the victim testified to the effect that “the victim was diagnosed with the escape certificate of a protruding signboard because it is difficult to say that he/she would not go beyond time, and that he/she was treated with the chest or shoulder, and that he/she received disc treatment at a hospital.”

In that sense, according to the fact-finding results with respect to the E hospital that issued a diagnosis letter, such as the escape certificate and the climatic base, the victim's examination of the escape certificate is mainly conducted.