Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On February 19, 2019, at around 17:55, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft by creshing the cresh in the “C” clothes store located in Masung City B by neglecting surveillance; (b) 10,000 won, which is the market price managed by the victim D (the age of 34).

Summary of Evidence

1. Written statements of D;

1. Photographs of damaged articles;

1. Results of the reproduction of on-site CCTV CDs;

1. A report on internal investigation (verification of CCTV images) and an investigation report (additional CCTV images);

1. The defendant and his defense counsel collected the CCTV image data in each field (the defendant and his defense counsel collected them to purchase the wall of this case at the time of the instant case, but put them into one part of the wall in order to prevent them from breaking the wall of this case, and put the wall of this case into one part of the wall of this case, and the rest of one part only was put into one part of the wall of this case, and the defendant did not have the intention to commit theft. However, if the defendant's behavior confirmed at the time of the instant crime, which was confirmed in CCTV image which was taken on the scene of the instant crime, is examined in detail in detail, it is not consistent with the defendant's defense, but it is difficult to believe that the content of the change itself is against the rule of experience, and thus, the defendant can be sufficiently convicted of the facts charged of this case. Accordingly, the above argument

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In light of the fact that the Defendant continues to deny the crime until this Court had been established even though the Defendant clearly convicted of the instant crime on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order, and there was a record of punishment several times for the instant crime, the amount of fine for the summary order against the Defendant shall be increased.