A. Defendant Incidental Co., Ltd., C, and D are jointly and severally and severally 627,732,775 won and 192,769,301 won among them.

The facts stated in “the cause of the claim” and “the correction of the cause of the claim” do not conflict between the parties, or show the overall purport of the pleadings in the entries in the evidence Nos. 2, C, D, and 1 through 6 (Defendant B, C, D).

(Defendant Non-Party Corporation). However, the Plaintiff recognized that Defendant B was subject to a qualified acceptance trial as the heir of Defendant B’s network E, and sought payment of the said money within the scope of the property inherited from the network E.

Meanwhile, Defendant D asserts that he renounced the inheritance of the deceased E’s property, but the Plaintiff asserted the status of the deceased E’s heir, not the claim of this case, but the status of the joint and several surety of the secondary public corporation. Therefore, the above Defendant’s assertion cannot be accepted.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendants is justified, and all of them shall be accepted.