2. The facts that the Defendant recognized the instant crime are favorable circumstances.

On the other hand, the Defendant suffered injury when the head of the victim was injured, and the degree of injury was relatively more severe, such as the two frameworks being isolated, and such a crime may cause a fatal hazard to the life and body of a person, and the nature of the crime is not good. The Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of suspended execution due to a special injury, and the Defendant appears not to have agreed with the victim, and appears to have not recovered from damage.

There is no special relationship or change of circumstances that can be newly considered by this court, and in full view of the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, and various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments of this case, it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.