However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On September 13, 2016, the Defendant reported on September 13, 2016, the front side of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, that “Abreath guest is not at a charge,” and the police officer E and F, assigned to the Seoul East-gu Police Station D police station D police officer assigned to the police station, who was on a boom.

G During the case, after having handled the case, he was allowed to pay a taxi fee, etc., he obstructed the course of the patrol vehicle by leaving the scene by leaving the patrol vehicle, having interfered with his body by pushing the patrol vehicle, and having the said G started the patrol vehicle between the Defendant and the police station, and caused the disturbance, such as having the police station go against the disturbance.

Defendant continued to have been called up upon the request of the above police officers to return home by the police officer slope H and policeman belonging to the said patrol group, and on the patrol vehicle, the police officer recommended the police officer to leave home, and she was on the patrol vehicle, and she was placed under the wheels of the patrol vehicle, and “I am off the taxi.”

Before solving the first time, the patrol car called "I do not get out of the scene" and the police officer requested that the police officer stop from leaving the scene and interfere with the course of the patrol vehicle. The police officer called "I am out of the shoulder of the above H" and "I am inside the military."

Nr. Dogna Dogna l.

The latter is to meet.

“....” The above I expressed “I’s intention to stop the Defendant,” and expressed “I’s intention to see “I’s left face”, and assaulted “I’s left face once in drinking....”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness J, G, F, and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of the parts of the victim's body;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is as follows.