When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 28, 2019, at around 18:15, the Defendant reported 112 to the “C” restaurant located in Pyeongtaek-si B, and used the c police box affiliated with the police box called the “C, which was sent to the scene,” and used the c police officer’s chests to listen to the statements on the details of the report.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field bond photographs, images, and closure photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine concerning the crime;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In light of the fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act and the degree of interference with the execution of official duties is relatively more severe, and that the defendant repents his mistake and does not have any criminal history against the defendant, it shall be taken into account.