beta
(영문) 부산고등법원 2020.07.09 2019나55876

손해배상(기)

Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants and the request for return of provisional payment by Defendant B Co., Ltd. are dismissed.

2...

Reasons

1. The court's explanation of this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this case as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

However, part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows, and the defendants should add to the judgment of the court of first instance as to the newly or repeatedly asserted matters in the court of first instance as follows.

[Supplementary part] Part 9-10 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the plaintiff "A apartment (hereinafter "the apartment of this case") in the third 9-10 of the judgment of the court of first instance had "Y apartment" (hereinafter "the apartment of this case") and "the plaintiff had "R apartment (road name address: Yangsan-si E; hereinafter "the apartment of this case") in Q Q in Yangsan-si."

2. Additional determination

(a) Determination on the defects related to liquid waterproof [1.1 for additional public use) lack of liquid waterproof and protective slope thickness of the underground parking lot, (1.1 for additional oil), toilets, bathing rooms floor and walls, one kind of waterproof of the multi-use rooms, lack of thickness (1.2 for additional oil), waterproof thickness of household balconys (1.2 for evacuation space, front and rear balconys), lack of water waterproof thickness of each of the above stuff roof (2.3 for additional public use), lack of water waterproof thickness (2.5 for additional public use), lack of water-proof thickness of water-proof walls (PITs, electric shock rooms, etc.), etc. (1 for the standard specifications for construction works in 2006 applicable to the apartment of this case) lack of water-proof standards for the thickness of liquid waterproof construction, and lack of water-proof standards for the thickness of each of the above provisions, there is no lack of water-proof capacity.

B. Even if each item constitutes a defect, it is difficult to view that the cost of labor for liquid waterproof construction is counted on the basis of the size and that it is in a quantitative proportion to increase or decrease in the thickness of liquid waterproofing.