beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.05.10 2017가합568090

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 403,685,887 for each of the Plaintiff A and B, and its corresponding KRW 392,378,548 for each of them, and KRW 392,378,548 for Plaintiff C.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The plaintiffs are co-owners who own 1/3 of their shares of 23,802 square meters of D forest land (hereinafter "the land in this case"). On June 3, 2002, the defendant paid approximately 22.70,000 square meters (hereinafter "F") to Dongcheon-si in order to transfer the Armed Forces E (hereinafter "the land in this case") to Dongcheon-si, the plan for national defense and military installations projects (hereinafter "the land in this case") was approved and publicly announced as H in the notification of the Ministry of National Defense. The plaintiff Eul paid the plaintiff's share of the land in this case from the plaintiff Eul on October 14, 2003, the plaintiff Gap and Eul on April 6, 2004, the compensation amount of the plaintiff in this case was 2094, the compensation amount of the plaintiff in this case to the plaintiff in this case, and the compensation amount of the plaintiff in this case to the plaintiff in this case from the plaintiff Eul-si in this case.

B. According to the original plan for the relocation project of this case, 1.30,000 square meters of the land expropriatedd in 22.70,000 square meters and around 6.20,000 square meters of the site where construction is possible, and 11.40,000 square meters of the land actually used for military facilities were purchased for the boundary and training of military units. However, after the F Transfer Plan was disclosed to the media, F did not carry out the above relocation project. 2) As a result, on November 4, 2005, the Seoul City Mayor, the Central Assembly, the representatives of the Shicheon City, the representatives of the Ministry of National Defense, the chiefs of the military installations of the Ministry of National Defense, and the F Domen, etc. constituted a multilateral consultative body and have been convened several meetings, i.e., "F shall be 5.60,000 square meters of the land expropriated in this case," and the remaining land area of this case shall be 50,000 square meters or less.