beta
(영문) 수원지방법원평택지원 2015.04.08 2014가합2350

유류비

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. As to the assertion of contractual liability, the Plaintiff, who is engaged in the wholesale retail business of oil in the main point of the Plaintiff’s assertion, entered into an oil supply contract with the Defendant’s employee who is engaged in the business of dismantling the structure, etc. of the non-scam structure, as to the construction site of the Sejong-si B Elementary School Construction Site (hereinafter “Scamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscams (hereinafter “Scamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscamscam.).

B. On October 15, 2014, the Plaintiff concluded an oil supply contract with the Defendant on whether the Plaintiff entered into an oil supply contract with the Defendant for each of the above construction sites, and the Plaintiff concluded an oil supply contract with the Defendant on October 15, 2014, the Plaintiff cancelled the confession on the third day for pleading No. 10:30 on October 15, 2014. As to whether the confession was contrary to the truth and due to mistake, the Plaintiff’s assertion No. 1 through 30, No. 1-3, No. 4, No. 10, No. 10, No. 4, and No. 4, and witness F’s testimony, and following the Defendant’s testimony on November 21, 2013, the Defendant deposited KRW 13,564,626 with the Defendant’s national bank’s name, deposited KRW 4,5626, and D, “the Defendant’s direct phone number” and the Defendant’s official phone number.