beta
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.10.26 2016고단2179

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, by imprisonment with prison labor for six months, and by a fine of KRW 2 million.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B by using mobile phone-making caming type E, “F”, etc., and receiving 120,000 won through 150,000 won from an unspecified number of men at one time, and by allowing a female sexual traffic G to go only at the telecom promised with men, and engaging in sexual traffic in the manner of carrying out sexual intercourse and dividing the same with G and its money. Defendant A takes charge of the role of bringing G to the place of sexual traffic, and Defendant C takes charge of the role of attaching a leaflet for advertising sexual traffic.

On May 16, 2016, around 22:50 on May 16, 2016, Defendants attempted to arrange commercial sex acts by receiving KRW 120,000 won in cash from male customers who had been contacted through the camcing camcling in Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and allowing them to sexual intercourse once with G, but they attempted to arrest police officers who pretend to have sexual traffic.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes and attempted to commit sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A written statement of the G production;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Defendants of relevant criminal facts: Articles 23 and 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Article 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A and C who choose the penalty: Defendant B who choose the penalty of imprisonment;

1. Defendant A and C to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service Defendant B: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A, C: The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, Defendant B, and C, stated to the effect that “A performed a work together with G to the extent of one month, and G had worked at the house of accommodation or male descendants (the investigative record 86-87 pages, 95-97 pages), G’s statement in investigation agency, and G’s statement and place where G customers met.”