When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in daily work.

피고인은 신용도가 낮아 대부업체로부터 정상적으로 대출을 받을 수 없다는 정을 알고, 생활정보지(C)에서 “D 대표: E, F, 당일 신용대출, 300만 - 1,500만 원, ★무직자, 일용직, 주부, 여성, 통신연체자 가능, ★소득 증빙 관계없음, ★소액대출 50-200만 원, G, 이자율 월 1-2.9%, 연 34.9% 이내, 연체, 추가비용 없음“이라는 내용의 광고를 보고 E에게 전화하여 허위의 재직증명(일명 작업대출)을 통해 국내 유명 대부업체로부터 대부를 받기로 상호 공모하였다.

As seen above, the Defendant, in collusion with Defendant E on September 10, 2015, by deceiving a person in charge of the lending company, and then received KRW 2 million from the Industrial Complex Loan Co., Ltd. (L&C) and KRW 3 million from the Social Loan Co., Ltd. (L&C) and KRW 5 million from the Defendant’s name, and issued KRW 1 million to E with the consideration thereof.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol of the accused and E;

1. Application of statutes on customer interest lists, loan transaction contracts, and transaction details by account;

1. Relevant Articles 347 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and the choice of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;