A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Defendant

B and Defendant A are married couple’s simple places, Defendant B is the victim E’s friendship, and Defendant A is a person who has been sub-entrusted from the victim E (the victim E (the victim’s age of 43, women) to December 2013 and operated “G” restaurant in the Nam-gu Seoul metropolitan area from July 2012 to December 2013.

Defendant

On December 2013, A and the victim E have caused conflicts due to the refund of the sublease deposit of the above restaurant.

1. Defendant A

A. On December 27, 2013, the Defendant, from around 19:00 on December 27, 2013 to 22:00 on the same day, made a call to the victim E, “I call to a restaurant,” and “I call to the restaurant, I am fright, I am me, and I am me to continuously call,” for three hours at around three hours.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

B. From around 02:38 on December 28, 2013, the Defendant left a voice message stating, “The victim did not receive a telephone from the victim,” and “The victim’s cell phone voice message sent to the victim a voice message with the content that she would have to complete the death of the victim in this pair of years, crys, and in this part, she completed the death of the victim, she completed the complete payment of the death of the victim, she now ever, and she would have come from the present, and she will have a remote stop.”

At around 14:46 on the same day, the Defendant continuously sent a text message to the victim “The victim shall file a personal accusation with the Ministry of Labor, shall request an investigation in the name of the tax office and shall request an investigation in the name of the head of the tax office.”

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim.

C. On January 2, 2014, around 12:00 on January 2, 2014, the Defendant committed a disturbance for about two minutes, such as “I” in the “I” managing the above victim’s “I,” with the large voice of “I, during the same year, I would be able to perform a funeral service, I would be able to perform a funeral service.”

Accordingly, the defendant is by force.