However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 19, 2014, the Defendant avoided a alcohol measuring instrument in a manner that does not put it into a alcohol measuring instrument and does not comply with a police official’s request for measurement of alcohol without justifiable grounds, even though he/she was required to comply with a alcohol measuring instrument by inserting it into a alcohol measuring instrument for about 30 minutes, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that he/she was driven under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking, smelling, drinking, drinking, drinking, drinking, etc. at the Jung-gu Police Station belonging to the Daejeon Middle-gu Daejeon Police Station, at around 01:10, while he/she was driven by C, while drinking alcohol on or around February 19, 2014.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on drinking control results;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act (Selection of Imprisonment or Imprisonment);

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation, community service order and order to attend a lecture under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, Etc. three times a fine due to drinking alcohol driving, two times a fine for a different species of punishment, and no other criminal record exists, the attitude of reflect, the age and occupation of the accused, etc. shall