A Imprisonment with labor for one year, for one year and four months, for Defendant B, for Defendant C with a fine of one million won, and for Defendant D.

[Defendant D’s criminal records] On September 8, 2016, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced two years of suspended sentence to imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on August 8, 2016, which became final and conclusive on December 17, 2016.

Defendant

E was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Northern District Court on August 21, 2009, and the execution of the said sentence was terminated on September 23, 2010. On April 3, 2015, the Daegu District Court sentenced the suspension of execution to five months of imprisonment for a crime of violating the Automobile Management Act, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 11, 2015. On December 9, 2016, the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 9, 2017, upon being sentenced to eight months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on December 9, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. Joint Crimes by Defendants A, B, D, and E: The Defendants were to drive each of the vehicles by Defendant A, B, and D, and Defendant E was to board the vehicle with Defendant D’s vehicle, and Defendant E intentionally collisioned the vehicle driven by Defendant B with the vehicle driven by Defendant D, and subscribed to the insurance money by pretending that the vehicle was the accident that was the accident that was the accident that was the accident that was the accident that was the sudden.

On September 16, 2013, the Defendants driven by Defendant B while driving a shower vehicle on the roads near Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and Defendant A driven by Defendant B.

While following the LMW vehicle, the vehicle intentionally conflicts with the BMW vehicle, caused the collision of the CMW vehicle by its shock, and caused the collision of the CMW vehicle by the Defendant’s vehicle prior to the operation of the CM vehicle, and the victim’s fire marine insurance (main state) was completed, as it is difficult for the Defendant D to reduce the speed from the speed of speed at the speed of the speed of the CM vehicle, the accident was accepted as if the CM vehicle, which was driven by the Defendant D, was 3.

As above, the Defendants conspired to deception the victim and corrected the phrase “as of September 16, 2013,” as stated in the indictment around September 23, 2013 from the injured party, by deeming that the phrase “as of September 16, 2013” was a clerical error.

From October 29, 2013 to receive KRW 25,00,000 of the unpaid repair cost of BMW vehicle, and receive KRW 5,500,000 of the non-repair cost of the ShiM vehicle;