출입국관리법위반
All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal against the Defendants of the lower court’s punishment (three million won by each fine) is too unreasonable.
2. The fact that the judgment reflects the crime, and that there is no previous conviction, are favorable circumstances.
However, the crime of employing illegal aliens is disadvantageous to the fact that it disturbs the immigration control order and the risk of human rights violations, such as exploitation of illegal aliens, the nature of the crime is not weak, the employment of three illegal aliens, and the employment period of each foreigner is not short.
In addition, taking account of the motive and background of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, the age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of Defendant A, and all the sentencing conditions shown in the pleading, it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the lower court against the Defendants is too unreasonable.
3. The Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.