피고인은 2017. 1. 6. 22:10 경 광주 북구 C에 있는 D 주점에서 술을 마시고 소란을 피우던 중 신고를 받고 출동한 광주 북부 경찰서 E 지구대 소속 순경 F으로부터 귀가 요청을 받자 ‘ 너 같은 초 짜가 뭘 아느냐,

In doing so, while taking a bath for Chewing gue, the police officer interfered with the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties in relation to the handling of reported cases, etc., by assaulting the F’s chest twice by hand, such as being pushed down twice with f’s chest, and snicking with fage, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect to the public prosecutor and the police accused;

1. Each statement made to the police with respect to F and G;

1. 112 Application of the 112 Reporting Case Handling List, E District Service Book, and photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the agreement of a police officer in charge of harm, a fine prior to and only once in 1989) is [the scope of a recommended sentence] The mitigated area (one month to eight months) (special mitigated persons), where the degree of violence, intimidation, deceptive scheme, or obstruction of public service is minor (the decision of sentence is minor) or more than the mitigated area (the decision of sentence is made).