beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.08 2016고단5170

공전자기록등불실기재등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant: (a) had two or more children, without his/her spouse, file a marriage report on August 14, 2015; and (b) had them maintain marriage status only in the document form by raising the number of dependants; (c) purchased a certificate of occupants’ savings, such as a comprehensive house subscription deposit, and offered them to divide their profits by selling the certificate of occupants’ savings, such as a comprehensive house subscription deposit, and selling them.

Defendant, G, H, and I, according to the above public offering, prepared a false marriage report at the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of the branch of

9. Around 24. 24. A false marriage report was prepared by the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the branch office of the Gu and submitted the above marriage report to the public official in charge of the Gu office

Accordingly, in collusion with G, H, I, etc., the Defendant recorded and exercised false facts in the family relationship register, which is a public electronic record.

2. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act by transferring the subscription passbook holders into a disguised manner in order to have them receive the purchase of apartment units, resell them, and share their marginal profits.

On January 2012, the Defendant is the passbook holder residing in Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul.

참조조문