대여금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion was that the Defendant joined the successful bid bid system operated by the Plaintiff and did not pay the Plaintiff a total of KRW 69 million until April 15, 2017, and did not pay the Plaintiff a total of KRW 7 million on May 7, 2017; KRW 7 million on May 17, 2017; KRW 65 million on May 29, 2017; KRW 10 million on June 9, 2017; KRW 4 million on June 12, 2017; KRW 40 million on June 15, 2017; KRW 5 million on June 15, 2017; and the Defendant did not pay the Plaintiff a total of KRW 1 million on the loan basis and KRW 5 million on June 15, 2017 (i.e., KRW 6 million on the loan basis; and (ii) the Defendant did not pay the Plaintiff a total of KRW 1 million on the loan basis.
2. Examination of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, and each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (Guidance Book) which seems to correspond to the plaintiff's above assertion is merely a document prepared by the plaintiff without the defendant's involvement, and there is no evidence to acknowledge it differently. Thus, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.
3. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.