2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant is divided into his mistake, and that the defendant's health is not good.

However, considering the fact that the nature of the crime of this case is not good, that the defendant again committed the crime of this case even though he had the same criminal record, the size of the game of this case is significant, the sentencing balance with the same kind of crime, the defendant's age, character and conduct and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., and various conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, are too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.