A Imprisonment for two years, Defendant B, and C shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months, Defendant D, E, F, and G, respectively.

1. Defendant A, Defendant D, and Defendant B committed the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the crime of the

On January 1, 2014, the Defendants: (a) at the J Licensed Real Estate Agent Office located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, the fact that Defendant B did not lease his house to Defendant D; (b) stated that Defendant B leased his house to Defendant D; and (c) drafted a false real estate lease agreement.

Defendant

A around January 13, 2014, the Defendant forged private documents by using a computer in the name column of the certificate of employment at the scam room located in the branch of Sung-gu, Sungnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, G, the company name column, “K” in its affiliated column, “business division” in its affiliated column, “agency” in its affiliated column, “01 September 01, 2013” in the entry date column, and “I prove that the scam is currently in office as of September 01, 2013,” and “I prove that the scam is currently in office as of September 01, 2013,” in the company name column, “I write the name “M” and “N” in the company name column, and affix a seal on the name of scam at will below the above N.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a letter of employment certificate in N, a private document concerning a certificate of fact.

B. On January 13, 2014, Defendants A and D’s uttering of the above-mentioned investigation documents in collusion with each other, Defendant A and the Defendant D have a fluence of a forged employment certificate, such as paragraph 1(a).