When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

피고인은 2018. 11. 10. 03:55경 의정부시 B에 있는 C 주점에서, 피고인과 위 주점 직원 사이에 술값 시비가 있다는 112 신고를 받고 출동한 의정부경찰서 D지구대 소속 경사 E에게 “야이 개새끼야, 여기 업주랑 짰냐. 너 얼마 받아 쳐먹고 저 새끼 말만 듣고 내 말은 안 들어주냐. 죽고 싶냐”라고 욕설을 하면서 양 손으로 경사 E의 멱살을 잡고 밀치는 방법으로 폭행함으로써 경찰관의 112 신고사건 출동에 관한 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. A written statement;

1. A report on investigation;

1. At night working days for three teams in the D District District;

1. Application of on-site photographs and invoices statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. In order to establish the legal order of the country of the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act and eradicate the light of the public authority, the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties needs to be punished strictly. However, the degree of obstruction of the performance of official duties and violence is somewhat minor, and the defendant has no special criminal record except for the criminal record sentenced to a fine due to a drunk