A. The plaintiff A is a party to the dispute. The plaintiff A is a party to the apartment of this case in the Young-gu Busan Metropolitan City (hereinafter "the apartment of this case").

2) Fdong G (hereinafter referred to as “instant housing”)

The plaintiff B is the husband of the plaintiff, and the plaintiff C is his father, and the plaintiff C is his father. 2) The defendant D apartment council of occupants' representatives (hereinafter referred to as the "the defendant's council of occupants' representatives") is the non-corporate body composed of the occupants of the apartment of this case.

B. On September 22, 2013, the apartment building of this case was cut down due to the breakdown of the rupture at around 18:30 on September 22, 2013, and Plaintiff A turned down candlelights on the top of the living room of the instant house for lighting. (2) However, Plaintiff A was able to turn down on the candlelight as above and was on the inside of the said house, and Plaintiff A was on the part of the said house. On September 22, 2013, 22:46, 2013, hereinafter referred to as “the fire of this case”).

(hereinafter referred to as the "accident of this case").

A small-scale operation of the fire alarm facility and the management type of the apartment of this case) The Fdong Guard room of the apartment of this case are installed with a fire alarm signal sent from the fire alarm devices in each household. On the other hand, when the fire alarm signal is received at the above fire alarm room, the warning type of the fire warning type, which is the principal and the district alarm type, shall operate when the fire alarm signal is received. (2) The principal alarm type is installed in the apartment Fdong Guard room of this case, and the district alarm type is installed in the corridor of each floor of the apartment of this case.

3) At the time of the instant fire, the fire reception team installed in the Fdong Guard room of the instant apartment complex was divided into the location of the principal and the bordering species, and thus, the said warning type was not operated. (4) The instant apartment is managed by the Defendant’s council of occupants’ representatives as an entrusted management rather than the autonomous management by entering into a contract for the management of the consignment with the housing management operator.

[Reasons for Recognition] The defendant's council of occupants' representatives: The absence of dispute, and the number with Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7 is included, below the number.