beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2018.02.06 2017고단1892

사기방조

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 4, 2017, an employee in charge of the phishing fraud assistance to the victim C was not an agent in charge of the lending of a phish bank, and even if receiving money from the victim, the employee made a false statement to the victim C by calling the victim C, stating that “I would allow the repayment by subrogation with high interest rate loans from the D agent of a phish bank, and would deposit the money to the account notified to the extent that I would make the repayment by opening the subrogated repayment account.”

On the other hand, on April 2017, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from an employee in charge of false fraud in the name of the Defendant, stating the bank account number (E) in the name of the Defendant to “to receive money from a bank counter and to deliver money to a person who received money from the bank; and (b) notified him of the bank account number (E) in the name of the Defendant.

around 09:43 on April 7, 2017, the employee of the 200,000 won was remitted from the victim by deceiving the victim by the above method, and around 09:43 on April 7, 2017, to the above post office account under the name of the defendant, and around 13:23 on April 7, 2017, the defendant withdrawn the above 6 million won, which was remitted from the bank located in Pyeongtaek-si dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si, and then delivered the above 6,00,000 won to the hM7 passenger car of the defendant, who is located in Pyeongtaek-siF, from around 11:0 on the same day.

In the end, the Defendant provided an account number in the name of the Defendant to the employees of the phishing fraud and provided a withdrawal and delivery of KRW 6 million, thereby allowing them to use the account in the name of the Defendant, thereby facilitating their fraud.

2. The non-name of aiding and abetting the victim I to the victim I is not an agent in charge of a loan of a bank at around March 31, 2017, and even if the victim received money from the victim, the victim C does not have an intent or ability to provide the loan.