손해배상(기)
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against Defendant D ordering payment in excess of the amount ordered below.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for the addition or further addition of Section 9 to Section 13 to Section 14 to Section 16 of "3. The scope of liability for damages" among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it shall be cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
(1) From December 17, 2010 to July 15, 2011, which is the date of the instant accident: 100% of the retirement allowances for the first instance court from December 17, 201, Plaintiff A, as a result of fact-finding on the Deputy Governor of the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service from December 17, 2010 to September 7, 201, shall be deemed to have received hospitalized treatment for 211 days during the period of the instant accident from December 17, 2010 to September 7, 201. Plaintiff A, as a result of fact-finding on the 205th day from December 17, 2010 to 205th day from December 17, 2010 to 30-15th day from July 15, 2011, to KRW 30-14th day from July 16, 2011.
However, as seen earlier, it cannot be recognized that the Defendant corporation is liable for damages related to the instant accident, as well as each description of Gap evidence Nos. 21 and 22 (including numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the first instance court.