The fact that the defendant led to the confession and reflect of the crime, that part of the damage was returned to or recovered from the victim, and that some of the victims (victim E, D) reached an agreement, etc. are favorable circumstances.

However, the sentencing of the instant thief, which is identical to the instant thief during the period of suspension of execution, is not recognized to be unfair in light of the circumstances, including the fact that the instant thief committed the instant thief in the same crime, and that the instant thief committed an additional crime, such as fabrication of private documents and uttering of falsified investigative documents, etc., while submitting the specification of transactions to an investigation agency to conceal the

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.