However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 12, 2017, the Defendant: “A police box of the Daegu-gu Police Station C, located in Daegu-gun B, Daegu-gun, on April 12, 2017,” and “Apule, Ma,” at the police box of the Police Station C, located in Daegu-gun, B.

(h) Habling down, spawling, spawn, and frightened;

Modern Doctrine and Doctrine Doctrine Doctrine.

Therefore, when the police officer E, who belongs to the above police box, recommended the defendant to return home, the police officer obstructed the police officer's legitimate execution of his duties concerning the maintenance of public peace and order by committing violence, such as saving f's chest and face by hand, and pushing the same police officer F's chest by hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes such as a written statement of the person operating at home, investigation report (Attachment to Work Place), and internal investigation report (Attachment toCCTV Images);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act suspended execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 of the Criminal Act) (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 of the Criminal Act is against the defendant committed the crime in this case, all of the damaged police officers agreed with

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection;