However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 18, 2013, at around 00:35, the Defendant: (a) demanded the victim that the victim D (n, 50 years of age) in the Dong-gu Gwangju-gu (hereinafter “Eju store”); (b) provided that the victim did not have an implied eye while drinking the snick line and drinking; (c) provided that the victim did not have any snick, but the victim did not have any snick; (d) provided the back head of the victim at one time using 300c glass World Cup (12.5cm in length, 7cm in width) dangerous articles on the table; and (e) carried the victim’s body part by hand, and (e) walking the body part of the excessive victim so far as possible, and (e) had the victim take an open top of the 300c glass World Cup (12.5cm in width, 7cm in width), which is a dangerous article on the table, and (e) had the victim take care of about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the police in relation to D or F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes stated in a written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da15488, Apr. 1, 2006) (see, 2008Da11448, Apr. 2, 201)

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act or more (the grounds for discretionary mitigation are repeated);