A. The sentence of the lower court (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The crime of arranging sexual traffic of this case, which is highly illegal to harm the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and the defendant committed the crime of this case during the repeated crime period due to the crime of this type; the defendant recognized and reflects the crime; the business period is short; the business size; the circumstances leading to the crime of this case; the circumstances leading to the crime of this case; the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, etc.; in light of various sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments, such as the circumstances leading to the crime of this case; and the circumstances leading to the crime of this case; and the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, etc.,

3. As such, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.