A. 6,299,640 won against Plaintiff A, 8,293,930 won against Plaintiff B, and 8,832,330 won against Plaintiff C, and each of them.

A. The Plaintiffs are all fixed-term teachers appointed pursuant to Article 32 of the Public Educational Officials Act. ① Plaintiff A from August 20, 2009 to August 20, 2006, ② Plaintiff B from September 2006 to August 2007, G middle school which is a public school, from March 2008 to August 2009, from G middle school which is a public school, from September 2009 to February 201 to 20.1, from March 201 to 209 to 30.2, from 209 to 20.2, from 209 to 20.2, from 30 to 209 to 20.2, from 200 to 209 to 30.2, from 200 to 200 to 209 to 3.2, from 200 to 20 to 200 public school.

B. (1) On July 13, 2006, the Defendant’s Minister of Education and Human Resources Development excluded the fixed-term teachers from the subject of performance bonus payment, i.e., guidelines for the payment of performance bonus for public educational officials in 06 years (the subject period of the first performance bonus shall be January 1, 2005; the subject period of the payment shall be December 31, 2005; the subject date of the payment shall be December 31, 2005; the subject date of the second performance bonus shall be January 1, 2006; the subject date of the payment on June 30, 2006; and the subject of the second performance bonus shall be June 30, 2006).

around October 207, the Minister of Education and Human Resources Development excluded fixed-term teachers subject to performance bonus payment on December 31, 2006. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 19690, Oct. 1, 2007; Presidential Decree No. 19690, Dec. 31, 2006>

On August 28, 2008, the Minister of Education, Science and Technology issued the guidelines for the payment of the performance bonus of public educational officials in 08 (the period of payment: January 1, 2007; December 31, 2007; December 31, 2007).