Defendant

A On April 5, 2018, the Seoul Central District Court has been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. and has been sentenced to one year and six months for the same year.

7. 13. The decision became final and conclusive.

Defendant

B On August 28, 2014, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. and completed the execution of the sentence on October 17, 2015.

1. Defendant A

A. The Defendant is a person who operates a “E” bag in the petition district D in the name of a person related to de facto marriage C in the name of a person related to de facto marriage.

On January 15, 2017, the Defendant, in the aforesaid “E” office, shall be deemed to have the victim F, “If the Defendant entered into a contract for the supply of stone and the exclusive contract for the customer mergial business on the cover sheet, he/she shall not be subject to all orders from other companies during the exclusive contract period, and shall be engaged in the stone and mergial business exclusively.

Meak Business exclusive contract deposit amounting to KRW 10 million, KRW 20 million, KRW 5 million, total deposit amounting to KRW 35 million, and KRW 35 million. In this regard, it is possible to help Korea, so there is no past business experience.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false statement.”

However, even if the defendant received the deposit from the injured party under the pretext of the exclusive contract, he was thought to be supplied with a stone from another business entity without being supplied with a stone from the injured party.

In such a situation, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and under such deception, shall be KRW 3.5 million on the same day under the name of the victim, KRW 5 million on the 19th day of the same month, KRW 10 million on the 20th day of the same month, KRW 16.39 million on the 25th day of the same month, and the same year.

2.3.10,00 won and 35 million won in total were remitted to C’s account on five occasions.

B. On August 12, 2017, the Defendant in violation of the Act on Specialized Credit Financial Business is expected to make a payment from B at the 1st floor coffee shop of the “E” building, which is the case where the Defendant has to make a payment within the country, after lending the “E” plastic card device, and making a payment after adding a surcharge and a answer.

“E” is a portable cover of “E” upon request by B.