The punishment of the court below against the defendant (limited to eight months of imprisonment, additional collection) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects it, and that there is no previous department, etc. are favorable to the defendant.

However, in light of the fact that the crime of arranging sexual traffic is a crime that commercializes women's sex and harms the sound sexual morals of society, and that the defendant commits the crime of this case without being aware of it during the repeated crime period, and that the defendant operates the sexual traffic organization of this case by employing five foreign women and six business travel drivers, etc., the degree of participation is disadvantageous to the defendant.

The above circumstances and the lower court determined the sentence in consideration of the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, and there is no change of circumstances that could be considered after the sentence of the lower judgment, and comprehensively taking account of various sentencing conditions that were shown in the argument of the instant case, such as the background of the instant crime, the circumstances after the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and sentencing of the same or similar cases, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since there is no ground for appeal. It is so decided as per Disposition.