2. The judgment appears to be against the defendant's wrong judgment, the degree of the defendant's participation in the crime of this case seems to be relatively insignificant, and there are favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant's profit acquired by the crime of this case is a small amount of profit acquired by the crime of this case. However, the crime of this case is not good for the defendant to attract victims who have a mental disorder for the purpose of getting a fraudulent loan, and the defendant share his roles with the other accomplices, such as D, etc., and it seems that the defendant committed the crime of this case in a systematic and systematic manner. The defendant again committed the crime of this case even though he had the history of punishment several times due to special robbery, even though he had been punished several times, and other factors of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the process and motive of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime, the defendant's age, occupation, family relation, etc., it cannot be said that the court

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.