A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Defendant

A is the representative of B Co., Ltd., which is a medium-sized overseas transportation intermediary, and D is the representative of F of the medium-sized Export Enterprise in Seo-gu Incheon, and the person in charge of export shipment of G (the representative H; hereinafter referred to as “H”) of the medium-sized Export Enterprise, and Defendant B (the representative director) is a corporation that carries out the combined freight forwarding business.

1. Defendant A

(a) When it is intended to export sealed goods, the name, standard, quantity and price of such goods and other matters prescribed by the Presidential Decree shall be reported to the head of any customhouse; and

Nevertheless, at the end of February 2011, D had requested the Defendant A to transport one of the Hyundai Egypted vehicle (201 chassis I), which is the representative H of the G of the secondary exporter company G, to Vietnam, while the export declaration was known.

Defendant A, who thought that the issuance of the export declaration certificate of the head of the customs office for the liquid vehicle requested for transportation, would take place prior to the shipment of the vehicle, proceeded with the shipment of the vehicle.

However, when K’s failure to file an export declaration with respect to one of the above liquid vehicles in progress, and the export declaration certificate for one of the above liquid vehicles was not issued, Defendant A proposed to D to prepare a false export declaration certificate to change the type and chassis number of another export declaration certificate already issued, and D to accept this proposal, D had the type of export declaration certificate (the filing number L, February 28, 201) already issued with the representative F as the export declaration certificate (the filing number L, February 28, 201) changed from the modern A-to-L (B/L, number N) to L and loaded the vehicle on February 28, 2011 on the basis of the documents.

(Entry from the port of March 1, 201). Accordingly, the defendant A exported one of the modern cent vehicles (number I) equivalent to 13,245,826 won in collusion with D which did not file an export declaration.

(b) The cargo manifest by improper means to submit the cargo manifest.