Defendant A shall deliver to the Korea Land and Housing Corporation the real estate listed in the attached list.

(b) the defendant.

A. On April 11, 201, the Defendant Korea Land and Housing Corporation (hereinafter “Defendant Corporation”) entered into a lease agreement with Defendant A on the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) (hereinafter “instant real estate”) with the period from April 14, 201 to May 31, 201. Defendant A paid the Defendant Corporation KRW 27,900,000 as the lease deposit (hereinafter “instant lease deposit”) and the Defendants entered into a new lease agreement with the period from June 1, 2013 to May 31, 2015 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

B. On April 20, 201, Defendant A transferred to the Plaintiff the instant claim for the refund of the lease deposit against Defendant Corporation, on the same day, notified Defendant A of the assignment by content-certified mail, and around that time, the said notification reached the Defendant Corporation.

【Defendant A’s ground for recognition: The fact that there is no dispute, Gap’s evidence of subparagraphs 1 through 4 (including each number), Eul’s evidence of subparagraphs 1 through 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments.

2. According to the above facts, inasmuch as the instant lease agreement terminated upon the expiration of the term, Defendant A is obligated to deliver the instant real estate to the Defendant Corporation upon the Plaintiff’s request by subrogation of the Defendant Corporation. At the same time, the Defendant Corporation is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the Plaintiff the claim for the refund of the instant lease deposit from KRW 27,900,000, deducting all obligations, such as rent, management fee, etc., that Defendant A owes to the Defendant Corporation under the instant lease agreement.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition by admitting all of the claims.