2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On March 11, 2016, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on a short-term visit (C-3) visa on March 11, 2016, and on May 23, 2016, applied for permission to change the status of stay to a general training (D-4) to the Defendant.

B. On June 13, 2016, the Defendant rejected the Plaintiff’s change of status of stay on the ground that “those subject to restriction on qualification change, those who were stated at the time of entry, are different from that of entry, and are unclear for the purpose

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). [Grounds for recognition] The Disposition in this case is without dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1 through 4 (including paper numbers) and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff alleged that the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on a short-term visit (C-3) visa. However, at the time of applying for change, the status of stay as a general training course was possible, and the Plaintiff’s decision to study in the Republic of Korea was made and registered with the admission permission from the Korean University of New School, and then made an official book in the Korean language at the International Language Research Institute, the instant disposition denying the change of the Plaintiff’s status of stay on the ground that “the subject of restrictions on qualification change, the purpose of study is unclear

B. In full view of the provisions of Articles 10, 17, and 24 of the Immigration Control Act, and Articles 12 and 30 [Attachment 1] of the Enforcement Decree of the Immigration Control Act, a foreigner is granted status of stay that meets the purpose of entry before entering the Republic of Korea and, in principle, to change his/her status of stay after entry into the Republic of Korea. Furthermore, the permission to change the status of stay is exceptionally permissible. Furthermore, the permission to change the status of stay is a permanent disposition granting the applicant the right to engage in activities that differ from the original status of stay. Even if the applicant satisfies the requirements prescribed by the relevant statutes, the permission to permit the applicant shall be granted the permission in consideration of the applicant’