However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant operates a stock company E with D (hereinafter “instant land”), while F is written in the indictment of the Victim G clans Association, while F is written in the indictment of the Victim G clans Association F, according to evidence, the G clans Association, the owner of the damaged money, is a victim. This fact is clearly known to the Defendant, and the F and the Victim G clans Association, as it is not likely to cause a substantial disadvantage to the Defendant’s exercise of the Defendant’s right to defense because it is a representative relationship with an organization where the indication of the party is allowed to be corrected in civil litigation, and therefore, F and the Victim G clans Association are deemed to be corrected and recognized without any amendment to the indictment.

The Chairperson is a person who purchased 149 square meters from the Defendant around May 201 in order to use the land as a road connected to H and one parcel, which is the first half-class owner of the franchise.

On May 13, 2011, the Defendant registered a subdivision of KRW 120 million with respect to the 149 square meters out of the land in this case and registered the transfer of ownership to the G clan Association at the E Office located in Sungsung City around May 13, 201.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, at the time of this case, the provisional seizure of the claim amounting to the maximum amount of KRW 559 million on the land above the land above the land of this case was established on the right to collateral security (the actual debt amount of KRW 420 million), the maximum amount of KRW 450 million on the claim amount of KRW 450 million in the K, and the claim amount of KRW 9,212,293 in the future of the Sejong Industry Development Co., Ltd., and since July 2010, the operation of the defendant E was difficult due to the lack of any property or income, even if the purchase amount is paid from the damaged person, there was no intention and ability to register ownership transfer in the future with the victim with the cancellation of the above collateral security and provisional seizure on the land of this case.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it.