2. In light of the following circumstances: (a) the judgment unit; (b) the Defendant had several previous departments; (c) the method of deceiving the Defendant was active; (d) the victim filed a complaint against the Defendant, and then withdrawn the complaint upon drawing up a promissory note amounting to KRW 20,000,00 from the Defendant; and (c) the Defendant did not comply with the agreement; and (d) the victim was punished against the Defendant; (c) however, the Defendant deposited a promissory note amounting to KRW 20,000,000 which is equivalent to the face value of the promissory note at the lower court to a certain extent that the damage was recovered; (d) the Defendant supported the Defendant with his husband, and all other circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, occupation, home environment, criminal motive, etc., the sentencing of the lower court is too somewhat

3. In conclusion, since the prosecutor's and the defendant's arguments are without merit, all appeals by the prosecutor and the defendant are dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.