However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 5, 2019, at around 05:35, the Defendant: (a) received 112 report that he was a male in front of the Bupyeong-gu Incheon B apartment C, and (b) was used as a male in front of the new source; and (c) the head of the police station D District D District of the Incheon Samsan Police Station, who called the Defendant at the site, attempted the Defendant to have a residence go back and take measures several times; (d) without disregarding this, the Defendant took a bath theory, such as “Cak”, on the ground that he stopped the above E, and committed assaulting the part of E on one occasion, with the left hand hand carrying a slick, and with the face of E, which was taken one time.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers regarding the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a photograph by 112 report processing process;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the confession and reflective nature, and the fact that there is no previous offense, other than one time before or after the punishment for the same punishment);