(See Supreme Court Decision 2013Da99409 Decided March 10, 2016, etc.). Regarding the plaintiffs' assertion that the cause of the defendant A's lien is denied with respect to each real estate listed in the separate list Nos. 1 through 5, the above lien is not nonexistent, and there is no evidence of assertion regarding the defendant A's claim that the lien is the lien holder, the defendant A's claim that there is the requisite fact of the lien, the existence of the claim related to the lien, the possession of the claim related to the lien, and the possession of the object (the defendant submitted a letter of waiver of the lien in the aforementioned E voluntary auction case of each real estate listed in the separate list Nos. 6 through 20, the defendant A submitted a letter of waiver of the lien in the above E voluntary auction case of the court). The above lien does not exist, and the defendant A reported the lien in the auction procedure listed in the separate list No. 1 through 5.

2. Each claim against the defendant B and C

A. The Plaintiff, the mortgagee of each real estate listed in the separate sheet indicating the claim, and the Plaintiff, the mortgagee of each real estate listed in Nos. 7 through 20 of the separate sheet, seeking confirmation that the above lien does not exist against Defendant B and C, who claimed as the lien holder of each real estate listed in the separate sheet.

(b) Defendant B: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3) (2) of the Civil Procedure Act; Defendant C: Judgment by deemed confession (Article 280 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

C. As a result, Defendant B and C with respect to each real estate listed in the separate sheet.