beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.06.17 2015나31072

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following two parts, and thus, it is acceptable to accept this case as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The phrase “this Court” at the bottom of two pages 9, 17, 3, 4 and 7 of the first instance judgment shall be amended to “Seoul Western District Court”.

The 13th, 5th, 12th, 13th, 13th, 2th, 2th 15th 15th 2th 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 17th 2nd 17th 11th 8th 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 15, 19th 3th 4, 14th 3, 5th 6th 8, 9, 11, 13th 8th 14th 8th 2nd 2nd 3nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 3

The plaintiff and the defendant shall revise "the plaintiff and the defendant" in the three pages of the judgment of the first instance.

The following is added between 8 and 9 (1) at the bottom of the judgment of the court of first instance, and between 17,061,534 (1) at the bottom of the same side; 2) Preliminary assertion, even if the Defendant partly performed the obligation to contribute the instant shares by offering collateral, there is a cause for dissolution, such as failure of trust between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, and thus, a claim for dissolution of the association formed under the instant business agreement is filed against the Defendant, and the liquidation amount of 25,261,816 (242,323,350 won [2,323,350 won [4,315,489,00 won [2,70,000 won - remaining 2,70,000,000 won for the instant real estate] - The Defendant’s contribution and expenses to be borne by the Plaintiff and 217,061,534 won (13,69,636,47,636,536,36,5,36, etc.