자동차관리법위반등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the punishment (6 million won in penalty) set by the court of the original instance as the court of the original instance is too unreasonable.
2. The judgment seems to have led to the confession and reflect on the crime.
It is considered that economic circumstances or living is difficult.
However, the criminal liability of the defendant is not against the law.
The criminal history of the same kind of crime has reached seven times.
The court of the court below rendered the sentence against the defendant by taking account of the aforementioned various positive and negative circumstances.
The judgment below
There is no new circumstance that can be considered in sentencing as a result of the sentence.
In addition, in full view of various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the commission of the crime, the circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, the lower court’s sentence is not deemed unfair.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.